Mississippi River Critical Area Program


Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Rulemaking Project

map


MRCCA Rulemaking Process and Status

In 2009, the Minnesota Legislature directed the DNR to establish rules for the MRCCA. In an effort to develop comprehensive draft rules, the DNR involved stakeholders and the public in an extensive participation process. At the outset of rulemaking, the DNR established a project website and listserv, notified all 30 local government units (LGUs) with jurisdiction in the MRCCA of the rulemaking and asked for their assistance in notifying residents and identifying stakeholders, and published the Request for Comments. DNR staff visited with staff and officials from each LGU to learn from their experience in administering MRCCA plans and regulations, and convened four geographically focused work groups representing a broad array of interests and perspectives to provide input during rule development. The DNR also worked with other agencies and held two public open houses to get feedback on draft districts and standards.

The result of this collaborative effort is a draft rule package and that is up-to-date, relevant, and easier to administer than the existing 30-year old Executive Order. The DNR's authority to take the draft rules to formal hearing/rulemaking has since expired; while the DNR has no plans to move forward with the rulemaking at this time, the draft rules pdf are available here for public view.

rulemaking process

The legislature did not prescribe a deadline for completing the rulemaking, although Chapter 14 external link includes deadlines for many of the rulemaking steps. Funding was provided for the 2010-2011 biennium.


Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions


Rulemaking Background

The 2009 Minnesota Legislature directed the DNR to establish rules for (Laws 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Section 5(e) external link and Section 27 external link) for the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA). The Legislation revised portions of Chapter 116G, and specified that rulemaking must commence by January 15, 2010 and include 30 day advance notification to local government units (counties, cities, townships, etc.) within the MRCCA. Minnesota Statutes Section 116G.15 external link requires the DNR to:

  • establish, by rule, districts within the MRCCA including:
    • determining the appropriate number of districts within each municipality,
    • taking into account municipal plans and policies, and existing ordinances and conditions, and
    • considering protection of key, identified resources and features.
  • establish, by rule, minimum guidelines and standards for the districts, which shall include:
    • the intent of each district and
    • key resources and features to be protected or enhanced.
  • and must take into account:
    • municipal plans and policies, and
    • existing ordinances and conditions.
  • The guidelines and standards must protect or enhance (specified) key resources and features.
  • establish a map to define bluffs and bluff-related features within the Mississippi River corridor critical area, including:
    • a preliminary bluff map at the outset of the rulemaking process,
    • refining it as part of the process, and
    • adopt a final bluff map at the end of the process.

History of MRCCA

The MRCCA, first established through Executive Order in 1976, and reaffirmed with Executive Order 79-19 pdf, establishes the following purposes:

  1. To protect and preserve a unique and valuable state and region for the benefit of the health, safety and welfare of the citizens for the state, region, and nation;
  2. To prevent and mitigate irreversible damage to this state, regional, and national resource;
  3. To preserve and enhance its natural, aesthetic, cultural, and historical value for the public use;
  4. To protect and preserve the river as an essential element in the national, state and regional transportation, sewer, and water and recreational systems; and
  5. To protect and preserve biological and ecological functions of the corridor.

The MRCCA extends 72-miles from Dayton and Ramsey upstream to the confluence with the St. Croix River downstream and includes a district of varying width extending from the river. The Critical Area is also designated as the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA) external link as a unit of the National Park Service. The boundaries are shown in the Critical Area/MNRRA Corridor Map page. The MRCCA map above illustrates communities and corridor districts within the MRCCA.

For GIS users, shapefiles of the MRCCA and districts are available from the DNR Data Deli.

Additional detail regarding the history and purpose of the MRCCA can be found in the Mississippi River Critical Area Program page.


Requests for Comments

The Request for Comments (RFC) was published on December 14, 2009. A copy of the RFC can be obtained here pdf or can be viewed in the State Register.

Summary of Comments received during the Request for Comment Period pdf


MRCCA Rulemaking Fact Sheets

Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area Rulemaking Overview pdf
(December 2009)


Proposed Districts

  • Draft Districts - October 2010
  • Draft Districts - August 2010

The DNR has prepared a revised draft of new MRCCA districts and descriptions (see October 2010 descriptions and maps below). Changes from the prior draft (presented at the August 12, 2010 work group meeting) range from minor district boundary adjustments to reflect ownership and planned future use, to changes in district assignments and scope. There also have been changes to the draft district descriptions. The revised draft district narrative is provided below and draft district revisions are outlined in red on the maps.

We particularly want to call attention to changes in districts for public parklands, and expanded application of the CA-4 designation.

In the prior draft, most public parkland was in the CA-1 district, with exceptions in downtown Minneapolis and St. Paul. In the new draft, parkland designations reflect the current Executive Order 79-19 districts: With a few exceptions, all publicly-owned existing and planned parklands that are currently in the urban or rural open space districts are in CA-1; parklands in the urban developed district are in CA-3, and parklands those in the urban diversified district are in CA-6. The CA-4 district has been expanded to include more intensely developed areas at bridge crossings in the urban open space district.

Description of proposed districts pdf

Below are higher resolution maps illustrating proposed districts:

Dayton|Ramsey PDF Anoka|Champlin PDF Coon Rpids|Chmpln PDF
Brooklyn Park PDF Fridley|Brklyn Cntr PDF Minneapolis - North PDF
Minneapolis - South PDF Fort Snelling PDF St. Paul - Downtown PDF
St. Paul - Airport PDF South St. Paul PDF Inver Grove Heights PDF
Rosemnt|Cott Grove PDF Hastings PDF

Proposed draft districts and narrative presented at August 12, 2010 work group meeting are available under the adjacent tab for comparison.

Below are the proposed district descriptions and maps of the proposed MRCCA districts; these were presented to the MRCCA work groups at the August 12, 2010 meeting. The maps correspond to workgroup areas, and also a map illustrating the entire corridor.

The current districts are described in Executive Order 79-19 pdf external link: the legal descriptions are in Appendix B and the district descriptions are in Item 2.B. of the Standards and Guidelines.

For GIS users, ESRI shapefiles can be obtained by contacting Jeff Berg (651-259-5729).

Description of proposed districts pdf

Below are higher resolution maps illustrating proposed districts:

Dayton|Ramsey PDF Anoka|Champlin PDF Coon Rpids|Chmpln PDF
Brooklyn Park PDF Fridley|Brklyn Cntr PDF Minneapolis - North PDF
Minneapolis - South PDF St. Paul - Ft. Snell PDF Lilydale-Mendota PDF
St. Paul - Downtown PDF St. Paul - Airport PDF South St. Paul PDF
Inver Grove Heights PDF Rosemnt|Cott Grove PDF Hastings PDF

 


Preliminary Draft Standards

  • Preliminary Draft
    Standards Comparison
    November 2010
  • Preliminary Draft
    Standards Comparison
    September 2010
  • Preliminary Draft
    Standards
    August 2010

Below are November 2010 revisions to the preliminary draft standards that were first reviewed by MRCCA work group members at their August 2010 meeting. Note that these standards have since been revised in the draft rules based on input from work group members, LGUs, other agencies, and the public. The most current draft districts (dated October 2010) are found under the proposed districts header above.

Preliminary draft standards comparison to EO79-19:

Current community plans and ordinances are based on the standards and guidelines in Executive Order 79-19 pdf external link. The community regulations must be consistent with the Executive Order, and may be more restrictive.

The comparison charts give a general idea of what local regulations are in place now, and how new rules might change them.

Except for some dimensional standards listed at the bottom of each chart, which were compiled from meetings with local government staff earlier this year, the comparisons do not analyze the two dozen local ordinances in effect in the MRCCA, however community ordinances must be consistent with Executive Order 79-19.

We anticipate the communities will want to do their own detailed comparison between the proposed standards and the specifics of their ordinances.

Below are the preliminary draft standards which were reviewed by MRCCA work group members at their August 12th meeting.

Preliminary Draft Standards:

Below is a feedback form for interested parties to provide commentary on preliminary draft standards.

Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) Rulemaking Project Feedback Form pdf

 


Draft Administrative Provisions

Draft administrative provisions of the MRCCA rule were reviewed at the 4th work group meetings. The handout below is unedited from the one provided at the meeting. The draft administrative provisions provide details on roles and responsibilities, policies and procedures for how the MRCCA rules are proposed to be administered on a state and local level, as well as draft definitions. Note that these provisions have since been revised in the draft rules based on input from work group members, LGUs, other agencies, and the public.


Related Reports and Links


MRCCA Project Newsletters


Questions?