Watershed Health Assessment Framework

 "Connecting Our Resources"
 

How Healthy are Minnesota's Watersheds? 

The Watershed Health Assessment Framework gives an overview of the ecological health of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds.  Like your family physician gathering blood pressure, weight and body temperature during an annual physical, these rankings indicate areas of concern and areas functioning well. 

By providing a snapshot of the condition of our natural systems today, this assessment also provides a baseline to discuss how to improve and maintain healthy systems for tomorrow. 

Moving forward, this site will report the results from regular check-ups to keep a closer, more informed eye on emerging health trends.

Home Page

 

Health Index List

Map Your Watershed

 

Mapbooks by Watershed

Supporting Literature

New users & educators! Use the Watershed Assessment Exercise to help you or your students learn to navigate the WHAF website. 

 

Please email all feedback to: WATcomments@state.mn.us

Watershed Health Report Cards This is a PDF file. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to download it. 33MB
(34 MB)

 

Steps to create a health index 

 

What natural resource features are in my watershed?

 

What is a watershed?

What are the five ecological components?

This slideshow requires the latest version of Adobe Flash Player.
 

Watershed Health is a term used to describe how well ecological systems are functioning. The biggest challenge in defining the health of any given watershed is to decide what "well-functioning" means for each location. 

 

A physician will decide if a human patient appears to be "healthy" based on measurements like:

  • body temperature,
  • blood pressure,
  • heart rate;

while also considering the patients age, their genetic background and their personal health history. 

 

An ecologist will decide if a watershed appears to be "healthy" based on measurements like:

  • habitat quality
  • water quality and quantity,
  • contaminants and risk factors,
  • plant and animal biodiversity

while also considering the climate, geology, location and land use history of the watershed. 



THE CHALLENGE OF MEASURING WATERSHED HEALTH

One major difference is that there are not target values for ecologists to use to guide their "diagnosis".  Is this watershed running a fever or not?  Does this watershed have high blood pressure or not? 

In most cases, instead of having a threshold value (98.6 body temperature), watershed health is measured by comparing the current condition with an estimate of how natural systems in that location would function if they were in optimal health.  Of course, many places are not currently in optimal health and there may be no existing reference condition to explore and understand for comparison. 

 

OVERCOMING THE OBSTACLES

In order to move forward with sharing important information about the health of Minnesota's watersheds, the Watershed Assessment Tool uses health rankings to illustrate the range of results for a variety of measurements for watersheds across Minnesota.  Eighteen Health Index values are used to compare results across Minnesota's 81 Major Watersheds.  Each index is scored on a scale of 0 to 100. Just like getting a score on a test, "0" is the least desirable condition or highest risk.  In contrast, a score of "100" represents the most desirable result.

Condition Index

Some of the index measurements look at the current condition of the landscape.  In some cases, the condition that would score a "0" or "100" is known and may exist somewhere in Minnesota.  Sometimes the condition that would score a "0" or "100" is unknown and other scientific information must be used to decide how to rank the index results.

Context Index

Some of the index measurements look at the context in which the other information needs to be evaluated.  Like using a patient's age and genetic pre-disposition to disease to inform human health decisions, a context index shows information about background risk factors such as erodible soils, steep slopes and climate conditions.  For these index values, the "0" may indicate the most vulnerable watershed found in Minnesota.  The context score may not be something that can be changed, but rather should inform choices about actions that are taken to minimize risk.