DNR Report 347: 2003; Analysis of Drilling and Sampling Techniques Used to Obtain Representative and Accurate Samples in Coarse Sand and Gravel Deposits

This slideshow requires the latest version of
Adobe Flash Player

Introduction extracted from page 1 of the report:

Introduction  Drilling has traditionally been a cost effective means of evaluating sand and gravel deposits. It is used to collect samples that are representative of the deposit. These samples are typically sent to a material lab for sieve analysis to detelmine the particle size distributions. The particle size distributions of the samples help determine the overall texture of the deposit, which is a key factor in determining the value of the deposit. However, different drilling equipment specifications, sample collection techniques, and reduction techniques all affect the final results of the sieve analysis, which in turn can dramatically affect the final evaluation of the deposit.

This study was completed to analyze several different drilling and sampling techniques. The purpose was to determine the best methodologies to obtain representative and accurate samples in coarse sand and gravel deposits. Multiple samples were collected using several different sampling techniques to compare the effects of each technique on the material sampled (particle size distribution of the material). Five primary hypotheses were tested: (1) Drilling with larger diameter augers represents coarser sediment (> 1.5") more accurately than smaller diameter augers, (2) Channel sampling represents coarser sediment more accurately than drilling, (3) Large channels represent coarser sediment more accurately than small channels, (4) Sediment sampled directly off of the auger under-represents coarse sediment, and (5) Sample splitting techniques affect the final size distribution. A test site near Bayport, Minnesota, was selected where a sand and gravel pit provided a good exposure of a relatively homogeneous cobble-rich sand and gravel deposit. The site provided good accessibility for both drilling and channel sampling (Figures 1 and 2).


View or download reports

Report 347: Analysis of Drilling and Sampling Techniques Used to Obtain Representative and Accurate Samples in Coarse Sand and Gravel Deposits This is a PDF file. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to download it.
(40 pages, 8.5 x 11 inches, 3.23 MB)
Author: J. Ellingson

Please note: Best results in viewing this report will be obtained by saving the file to a location of your choice and opening with Adobe Reader or Acrobat. Some report information may not display as a result of opening with Acrobat directly from a web browser.

This report has been scanned in and applied with optical character recognition (OCR) which electronically translates the scanned image printed text into machine-encoded text. This allows users to then
search the document by keywords in Adobe Reader or Acrobat software.

Disclaimer and Copyright Protection: Maps, Reports, Data, and Other Information:
The State of Minnesota makes no representations or warranties express or implied, with respect to the use of the information contained herein regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability, completeness, usefulness, or reliability of this information for any purpose. The user accepts the information “as is." The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred as a result of any user’s reliance on this information. All maps, reports, data, and other information contained herein are protected by copyright. Permission is granted to copy and use the materials herein for any lawful noncommercial purpose. Any user of this information agrees not to transmit or provide access to all or any part of this information to another party unless the user shall include with the information a copy of this disclaimer.