Falco peregrinus    Tunstall, 1771

Peregrine Falcon 


MN Status:
special concern
Federal Status:
none
CITES:
yes
USFS:
none

Group:
bird
Class:
Aves
Order:
Falconiformes
Family:
Falconidae
Habitats:

(Mouse over a habitat for definition)


Falco peregrinus Falco peregrinus Falco peregrinus Falco peregrinus

Click to enlarge


Map Interpretation

Map Interpretation

  Synonyms

  Basis for Listing

The Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregrinus), which occurs on every continent but Antarctica, is probably the most wide-ranging land bird in the world. Despite its broad distribution, this falcon came dangerously close to extirpation in the United States in the 1950s and 1960s and declined significantly in many other parts of its range. Although habitat loss and increasing human activity negatively affected some populations, these factors could not adequately explain the sudden worldwide decline. The principal trouble-signs, broken eggshells and non-breeding adults, were soon attributed to contamination by organochlorine pesticides, principally DDT. Following World War II, extensive use of these chemicals throughout the world caused their accumulation in the food chain and the subsequent demise of the Peregrine Falcon. In Minnesota, a breeding population that once totaled 30-40 pairs was extirpated, primarily by DDT poisoning, between 1946 and 1962. In 1970, the Peregrine Falcon was listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act and, in 1972, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned DDT. 

As a result of restoration efforts, Peregrine Falcons once again nest in Minnesota, and their range in the United States continues to increase. Originally listed as endangered in the state in 1984, in 1996, the state status of this species was changed to threatened.  In 1999, the Peregrine Falcon was removed from the federal Endangered Species List

The Peregrine Falcon recovery effort in Minnesota and the Midwest United States has been a great success. In Minnesota, the number of territorial pairs and young fledged has continued to increase, reaching 70 pairs fledging 142 young in 2015 (Midwest Peregrine Society 2015). Because of the continuing population growth of nesting Peregrine Falcons in Minnesota, in 2013, the state status was changed from threatened to special concern.

  Description

The Peregrine Falcon is readily distinguished from most other raptors by its long, pointed wings, narrow tail, and strong, direct flight, all typical of falcons. The Peregrine Falcon is best distinguished from other Minnesota falcons by its large size combined with extensive, black, facial markings. Adults have dark blue to slate gray upperparts, white throats, and spotted or barred underparts. Immature falcons have the same markings, but are brown or blue-brown.

  Habitat

In the past, Peregrine Falcons in Minnesota nested on cliff ledges along rivers or lakes. Presently, they nest primarily on buildings and bridges in urban settings and use historic eyries on cliffs along Lake Superior and the Mississippi River. Because Peregrine Falcons specialize in direct, aerial pursuit of avian prey, they prefer open, non-forested areas for hunting.

  Biology / Life History

Many Peregrine Falcons migrate thousands of miles to spend the winter in Mexico and Central and South America, but some overwinter in the United States. They return to their northern breeding grounds in late April to early May. Young are raised in eyries (indentations scraped into the soil of rocky cliff ledges) or on flat surfaces of buildings or bridges. Typically, 2-3 eggs are laid. Hatchlings usually fledge at 42 days, but they remain with their parents for several more weeks while learning to fly and hunt. Peregrine Falcons feed mainly on birds, ranging from warblers to ducks that are caught and killed in mid-air. They have been clocked at speeds over 200 mph while in pursuit of prey. In urban areas, pigeons provide an abundant food source. Small mammals, lizards, and fish may also be eaten (USFS 1999).

  Conservation / Management

Continued threats to Peregrine Falcon populations include collisions with buildings, disease, environmental pollutants, predation (particularly by Great Horned Owls [Bubo virginianus] and Raccoons [Procyon lotor]), and potential loss or disturbance of natural cliff nesting sites. To ensure that there is adequate nesting habitat for these birds, cliffs in areas considered essential for nesting should be protected from development. Providing nest-boxes as protection from the weather and from predators may improve reproductive success in these cliff habitats. Pesticide levels in the avian food supply and in rivers and lakes must be monitored to prevent a repetition of the DDT disaster of the 1950s. Continued communication with the owners of buildings where urban Peregrine Falcons are nesting is essential.

  Conservation Efforts in Minnesota

A substantial Peregrine Falcon reintroduction effort began in Minnesota in 1982 after several, earlier attempts failed. This effort was led by The Raptor Center at the University of Minnesota, with support from the DNR's Nongame Wildlife Program and numerous other agencies and businesses. Because Great Horned Owl and Raccoon predation resulted in significant losses of Peregrine Falcons in natural cliff habitats, the reintroduction effort focused on tall buildings in urban areas. In 1993, the reintroduction goal of 40 territorial pairs in the Midwest was surpassed. In 1998, at least 24 Peregrine Falcon pairs fledged 52 young in Minnesota. By 2007, this number had increased to 52 pairs and 94 young fledged (Redig et al. 2007), and by 2015, it increased further, to 70 pairs fledging 142 young (Midwest Peregrine Society 2015). The reintroduction of Peregrine Falcons in Minnesota as discontinued in 1989, as it was no longer deemed necessary to recovery efforts. Conservation efforts have shifted to nest monitoring, banding of young, and genetic studies.  

Approximately 70% of breeding Peregrine Falcons in the Midwest now inhabit urban or semi-urban areas and nest on tall buildings, bridges, and smokestacks, a marked change from the original, cliff-nesting population (Redig and Tordoff 1993; Tordoff et al. 2005). Owners of buildings where Peregrine Falcons nest have been educated about the plight of this species and are encouraged to protect the nesting birds. Peregrine Falcons have been slow to recolonize their original cliff habitat along the Mississippi River, in part due to heavy predation by Great Horned Owls (Tordoff and Redig 1988).

Currently, 30% of Midwestern Peregrine Falcons continue nesting on cliffs. The majority of Minnesota cliff nesting sites are along the North Shore of Lake Superior (North Shore Highlands), with several sites in southeastern Minnesota along the Mississippi River (The Blufflands). There have also been occasional reports of potential nesting Peregrine Falcons in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, but their nesting status in this remote area is poorly known. Most Peregrine Falcon nest sites along Lake Superior were designated an Important Bird Area by Audubon Minnesota. For yearly reports on the status of Peregrine Falcons in Minnesota, visit the Midwest Peregrine Society website.

  Authors/Revisions

Revised:  Steven P. Stucker, MN DNR, 2017

  References

Redig, P. T., and H. B.Tordoff. 1993. Midwest Peregrine Falcon Restoration, 1993 Report. The Midwest Peregrine Project. 85 pp.

Redig, P. T., J. S. Castrale, and J. A. Goggin. 2007. Midwest Peregrine Falcon Restoration, 2007 Annual Report. Midwest Peregrine Society. 64 pp.

Tordoff, H. B., and P. T. Redig. 1988. Dispersal, nest site selection, and age of first breeding in Peregrine Falcons released in the Upper Midwest, 1982-1988. Loon 60(4):148-151.

Tordoff, H. B., J. A. Goggin, and J. S. Castrale. 2005. Midwest Peregrine Falcon Restoration, 2005 Annual Report. The Midwest Peregrine Project. 54 pp.

U.S. Forest Service. 1999. Population viability assessment in forest plan revision. Statement of purpose and reason. Draft species data records: Falco peregrinus. United States Forest Service, Region 9.