Northern Pike Regulation Review for Big Swan, Cedar (Near Upsala) and Bass (Near Burtrum) lakes.
A public meeting was held September 11, 2017 at Burtrum Community Center to review and hear your comments regarding potential regulation changes. You can comment through September 21, 2017 by filling out the electronic form (link below), email, write or call to the contact below.
This year we are reviewing northern pike regulations currently in place for Big Swan Lake (Currently has a 24-36" protected slot limit with 6 fish bag limit, only one allowed over 36"), Cedar and Bass lakes (both currently have a 40" Minimum length limit with a 3 fish bag limit). We can choose to leave the regulations as they are, modify the regulations, or remove the regulations in favor of state-wide options. Our current thoughts (based on biology) are to keep the slot length limit on Big Swan Lake, but modify the 40" minimum length limits on both Cedar and Bass to 26" maximum length limits with a three fish daily bag limit. Please feel free to contact us with further questions.
Eric Altena -
Little Falls Area Fisheries Manager,
16543 Haven Road
Little Falls, MN 56345
320-616-2450 x 225
10 sunfish bag limit regulation on six area lakes
- Power point presentation in PDF format on the proposal
- Sunfish fact sheet regarding the 10 sunfish bag limit proposal
After review of angler attitudes and preferences, six lakes will have daily bag limit reduced to 10 from the statewide limit of 20. The regulations were approved with minimal objection by the public through the public comment process. The lakes are Long(Higgins), Moose and Maple lakes in Todd County, Green Prairie-Fish and Sullivan Lakes in Morrison County and Platte Lake in Morrison/Crow Wing counties.
The new reduced bag limit will go into effect March 1, 2016. Signs will be posted on all six area lakes indicating the change. We will also have a press release distributed to local media outlets and fliers out at area bait/tackle stores prior to the March 1, 2016 date.
Please write, email or call if you have questions.
MNDNR- Eric Altena
16543 Haven Road
Little Falls, MN 56345
320-616-2450 X 225
Public meeting dates were held:
- September 8th 7-9 PM at the Club of the Pines- 21900 370th Ave, Hillman, MN 56338
- September 9th 6-8 PM at the Long Prairie City Hall - 615 Lake St S Long Prairie, MN 56347
One of the best things we can do to help our sunfish populations is letting the largest male bluegill go. If you need to harvest sunfish, it is better to take the female sunfish. See the image below that shows he difference between a male Bluegill (upper right) and a female Bluegill (Lower left). The largest male sunfish in the population limit the potential that the rest of the population can get to. Keep medium size sunfish and let the largest males go.
Proposal to modify bass regulations on Pierz-Fish Lake- Morrison County
DNR Fisheries staff have been monitoring the bass population on Pierz-Fish Lake since 1995. Experimental regulations for Largemouth Bass took effect in the spring of 1997. These regulations were part of a statewide, LCCMR funded project to increase fishing quality. All largemouth bass greater than 12 inches long must be returned to the water immediately. The sunset date for the largemouth bass regulation was March 1, 2006. In 2006 the regulation was modified to the current 12-20” Protected Slot Limit (PSL) with one fish over 20” allowed per day and a six fish possession limit. The lake association has requested to consider increasing the lower end of the PSL to 14”. This, along with the Bass Technical Committee recommendations in 2012, has allowed for the consideration of modification of regulations on Pierz-Fish Lake. There has been little improvement in the size structure of Largemouth Bass in Pierz-Fish Lake since the 1996 12” maximum length limit implementation, or the conversion to the 12-20” PSL in 2006. However, potential for angler education and increased harvest may allow for Largemouth Bass size structure improvement. The regulation if approved, would be a six fish daily bag limit with 14-20" Protected Slot Limit and only one bass over 20" daily.
An open house was offered on September 8th between 8:00AM and 4:30 PM at the Area Fisheries office in Little Falls, 16543 Haven Road, Little Falls, MN 56345. Comments can be submitted in person, phone, by mail, or email through October 4th, 2015. 320-616-2450 X 225,[email protected]
Panfish Postcard Survey Winter 2012-2013
A mail-in survey of angler attitudes was conducted during the winter of 2012-2013 in the vicinity of Little Falls, in central Minnesota. The purpose of this project was to assess angler attitudes pertaining to potential management options for bluegill in the Little Falls work area. Bluegill are almost certainly the most pursued fish in the Little Falls work area. More than twice as many sunfish are harvested in Minnesota each year (15.6 million) than the second most frequently angled fish, the black crappie (7.0 million). Despite the popularity of sunfish to anglers only two lakes in the work area are managed for sunfish via specialized fishing regulations. Since 1999 DNR Fisheries staff have been conducting spring trap net assessments targeting panfish on many area lakes to more adequately assess sunfish populations and determine if suitable growth, recruitment and mortality characteristics exist to manage for quality within these populations. Spring trap net sampling indicated that several lakes contained fast growing bluegill with fishing harvest probably limiting the abundance of larger fish (over 8 inches).
An initial mailing of 1000 surveys was sent to anglers randomly selected from the 2011 DNR License Bureau database. A total of 554 response cards (56% response rate) were received out of a net total of 997 deliverable surveys. This mail-in survey provided a less biased and more comprehensive evaluation of angler attitudes toward intended management strategies than one could expect from the public meeting process. Bluegill fishing was popular amongst respondents with 94% having pursued sunfish within the past year and 59% pursuing sunfish in excess of 20% of the time. A high percentage of anglers (68%) indicated they had harvested a daily limit of sunfish on at least one occasion within the past year and more than 20% had kept limits on 5 or more occasions. A majority of anglers (54% vs 46%) felt that fishing pressure was impacting the quality of sunfish they were catching. Respondents were asked whether they supported or opposed three types of specialized regulations aimed at improving bluegill size structure. A copy of the postcard containing the question asked is found below. Angler support exceeded opposition to all three regulation options explored. The most popular option was a restriction of the bag limit to 10 sunfish which garnered 49% support versus 30% opposition. Few respondents indicated needing more than 20 sunfish to provide a meal for their residence. Reducing the bag limit to 10 fish would not be prohibitive to the harvest of a meal of fish when two or more people are fishing together. It may be possible that a 10 fish bag could promote fishing with friends or family members.
Results from this survey illustrated the popularity of sunfish angling in central Minnesota and provided valuable insights into the behaviors, perceptions and opinions of a large cross- section of respondents. Although sunfish have always been considered a “food fish” by most anglers, responses to this survey suggest that harvest restrictions may be supported by a majority of fishermen/women in an effort to improve sunfish size. The most popular regulation option in this survey consisted of a 10 fish daily bag limit for sunfish which has been shown to increase the size structure of bluegill populations in central Minnesota lakes. A significant percentage (68%) of mail in survey responders had harvested at least one limit of sunfish in the past year indicating that a bag limit reduction may be effective in reducing harvest. In moving forward with more intensive management of the sunfish resource in the Little Falls area, implementation of the 10 fish bag limit on suitable candidate lakes appears to be the most palatable option to our constituents. The other two regulation options which were explored in this survey also received significant support from respondents and may be considered as potentially useful in the future. Based on comments received during the mail in and internet surveys, the 10 fish bag was most popular due to its simplicity. The complexity of the other two options probably reduced their favorability. Several respondents indicated that they did not want to measure each sunfish they caught. Sharing survey results with stakeholders will lend transparency to the decision-making process where public trust often appears compromised by misperceptions about where the public stands on specialized fishing regulations.